Concordance

Irell Rolls Out Above-Market Year-End Bonuses

• Asbestos, Other Dust Case Transferred To New York Deferred Docket MEALEY'SDEC 23, 2022
• Split DC Circ
• Agrees To Pause Four EPA Pesticide Petitions LAW360DEC 23, 2022
• Ex-Morgan Stanley Atty Loses Whistleblower Suit At DC Circ
• LAW360DEC 23, 2022
• A Sober Assessment of the Growing U
• S
• Asylum Backlog: TRAC LEGAL NEWSROOMDEC 22, 2022
• Lexis+ Experience results with superior research, data-driven insights, and practical guidance, all via one premium legal solution EXPLORESIGN IN
• Lexis Finish strong as you research with over 60,000 trusted legal, news, and public records sources EXPLORESIGN IN Finish strong as you research with over 60,000 trusted legal, news, and public records sources
• Nexis Premium & online news and business sources - expertly curated just for you in one database EXPLORESIGN IN Premium & online news and business sources - expertly curated just for you in one database
• Nexis Newsdesk Powerful media monitoring and analytics to quickly uncover critical insights about your brand, competitors, and market EXPLORESIGN IN Powerful media monitoring and analytics to quickly uncover critical insights about your brand, competitors, and market
• LexisNexis IP Solutions A comprehensive, accurate and easy-to-use approach to patent analytics and patent research EXPLORE A comprehensive, accurate and easy-to-use approach to patent analytics and patent research
• Print & eBooks Full collection of legal titles from Matthew Bender and other trusted publishers, plus the most legal eBooks anywhere SHOP Full collection of legal titles from Matthew Bender and other trusted publishers, plus the most legal eBooks anywhere
• Pacific Gas & E
• Co
• v
• G
• W
• Thomas Drayage etc
• Co
• S
• F
• No
• 22580 Defendant appeals from a judgment for plaintiff in an action for damages for injury to property under an indemnity clause of a contract
• VIEW CASE OPINION

Pacific Gas & E. Co. v. G. W. Thomas Drayage etc. Co.

S F No 22580 Defendant appeals from a judgment for plaintiff in an action for damages for injury to property under an indemnity clause of a contract

• People v

• Sanchez S216681 CORRIGAN, J

• —In Crawford v

• Washington (2004) 541 U

• S

• 36 [158 L

• Ed

• 2d 177, 124 S

• Ct

• 1354] (Crawford), the United States Supreme Court held, with exceptions not relevant here, that ] the admission of testimonial hearsay against a criminal defendant violates the Sixth Amendment right to confront and cross-examine witnesses

• VIEW CASE OPINION CORRIGAN, J —In Crawford v Washington (2004) 541 U S 36 [158 L Ed 2d 177, 124 S Ct 1354] (Crawford), the United States Supreme Court held, with exceptions not relevant here, that ] the admission of testimonial hearsay against a criminal defendant violates the Sixth Amendment right to confront and cross-examine witnesses

• In re Caremark Int'l CONSOLIDATED CIVIL ACTION NO

• 13670 Pending is a motion pursuant to Chancery Rule 23

• 1 to approve as fair and reasonable a proposed settlement of a consolidated derivative action on behalf of Caremark International,  [**2]  Inc

• ("Caremark")

• VIEW CASE OPINION

In re Caremark Int'l

CONSOLIDATED CIVIL ACTION NO 13670 Pending is a motion pursuant to Chancery Rule 23 1 to approve as fair and reasonable a proposed settlement of a consolidated derivative action on behalf of Caremark International,  [**2]  Inc ("Caremark")

• Pierce v
• Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp
• A-51 This case presents the question whether an employee at will has a cause of action against her employer to recover damages for the termination of her employment following her refusal to continue a project she viewed as medically unethical
• VIEW CASE OPINION

Pierce v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp.

This case presents the question whether an employee at will has a cause of action against her employer to recover damages for the termination of her employment following her refusal to continue a project she viewed as medically unethical