Irell Rolls Out Above-Market Year-End Bonuses

• Asbestos, Other Dust Case Transferred To New York Deferred Docket
  MEALEY'SDEC 23, 2022
• Split DC Circ
• Agrees To Pause Four EPA Pesticide Petitions
  LAW360DEC 23, 2022
• Ex-Morgan Stanley Atty Loses Whistleblower Suit At DC Circ
• LAW360DEC 23, 2022
• A Sober Assessment of the Growing U
• S
• Asylum Backlog: TRAC
  LEGAL NEWSROOMDEC 22, 2022
• Lexis+
  Experience results with superior research, data-driven insights, and practical guidance, all via one premium legal solution
  EXPLORESIGN IN
• Lexis
  Finish strong as you research with over 60,000 trusted legal, news, and public records sources
  EXPLORESIGN IN
  Finish strong as you research with over 60,000 trusted legal, news, and public records sources
• Nexis
  Premium & online news and business sources - expertly curated just for you in one database
  EXPLORESIGN IN
  Premium & online news and business sources - expertly curated just for you in one database
• Nexis Newsdesk
  Powerful media monitoring and analytics to quickly uncover critical insights about your brand, competitors, and market
  EXPLORESIGN IN
  Powerful media monitoring and analytics to quickly uncover critical insights about your brand, competitors, and market
• LexisNexis IP Solutions
  A comprehensive, accurate and easy-to-use approach to patent analytics and patent research
  EXPLORE
  A comprehensive, accurate and easy-to-use approach to patent analytics and patent research
• Print & eBooks
  Full collection of legal titles from Matthew Bender and other trusted publishers, plus the most legal eBooks anywhere
  SHOP
  Full collection of legal titles from Matthew Bender and other trusted publishers, plus the most legal eBooks anywhere
• Pacific Gas & E
• Co
• v
• G
• W
• Thomas Drayage etc
• Co
• S
• F
• No
• 22580
  Defendant appeals from a judgment for plaintiff in an action for damages for injury to property under an indemnity clause of a contract
• VIEW CASE OPINION

Pacific Gas & E. Co. v. G. W. Thomas Drayage etc. Co.

S
F
No
22580
Defendant appeals from a judgment for plaintiff in an action for damages for injury to property under an indemnity clause of a contract

• People v

• Sanchez
  S216681
  CORRIGAN, J

• —In Crawford v

• Washington (2004) 541 U

• S

• 36 [158 L

• Ed

• 2d 177, 124 S

• Ct

• 1354] (Crawford), the United States Supreme Court held, with exceptions not relevant here, that ] the admission of testimonial hearsay against a criminal defendant violates the Sixth Amendment right to confront and cross-examine witnesses

• VIEW CASE OPINION
  CORRIGAN, J
  —In Crawford v
  Washington (2004) 541 U
  S
  36 [158 L
  Ed
  2d 177, 124 S
  Ct
  1354] (Crawford), the United States Supreme Court held, with exceptions not relevant here, that ] the admission of testimonial hearsay against a criminal defendant violates the Sixth Amendment right to confront and cross-examine witnesses

• In re Caremark Int'l
  CONSOLIDATED CIVIL ACTION NO

• 13670
  Pending is a motion pursuant to Chancery Rule 23

• 1 to approve as fair and reasonable a proposed settlement of a consolidated derivative action on behalf of Caremark International,  [**2]  Inc

• ("Caremark")

• VIEW CASE OPINION

In re Caremark Int'l

CONSOLIDATED CIVIL ACTION NO
13670
Pending is a motion pursuant to Chancery Rule 23
1 to approve as fair and reasonable a proposed settlement of a consolidated derivative action on behalf of Caremark International,  [**2]  Inc
("Caremark")

• Pierce v
• Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp
• A-51
  This case presents the question whether an employee at will has a cause of action against her employer to recover damages for the termination of her employment following her refusal to continue a project she viewed as medically unethical
• VIEW CASE OPINION

Pierce v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp.

This case presents the question whether an employee at will has a cause of action against her employer to recover damages for the termination of her employment following her refusal to continue a project she viewed as medically unethical