Tigris says its product, S3-compatible API, zero-egress pricing and team stay the same. Dropbox will use it to start DBX Agent Cloud, storage for companies building AI applications, with filesystem and content-processing features next.
Apple will scan iCloud items shared by open link from version 27.3
EditorialBy TrustList Editorial
Items shared with Anyone with the Link lose end-to-end encryption even under Advanced Data Protection, and Apple can disable the account behind content it judges harmful.
About Apple will scan iCloud items shared by open link from version 27.3
Apple will scan iCloud items shared by open link from version 27.3
3 November 2026: Apple says that from version 27.3 of iOS, iPadOS, macOS and visionOS, anything in iCloud shared with "Anyone with the Link" will be checked for harmful content, and that such an item is no longer end-to-end encrypted even when the owner has Advanced Data Protection turned on. Staff who share work files by open link will fall under this.
Not yet independently verified. Apple gives no release date for version 27.3, and does not say how it defines harmful content or whether links created before 27.3 are covered. Apple's support article is the only primary source. We will update this when it can be confirmed, and remove this note.
Which sharing option is affected
The change sits inside a choice users already make. An item stored in iCloud, such as a photo in iCloud Photos or a file in iCloud Drive, can be sent as a copy or shared as a link. A link can go to "People you choose", meaning only those invited or approved, or to "Anyone with the Link", which Apple now says makes the item accessible to anyone holding the link, Apple included. The support article describes checks only for the second option.
Advanced Data Protection is Apple's setting for end-to-end encryption across most of iCloud. Its removal for open-link items is stated plainly: to make the sharing work, the item loses that protection, for the owner and for participants.
What Apple can do to an account
The consequences reach well beyond the file. If harmful content is uploaded, Apple "reserves the right to move, refuse, modify, remove, or delete the content at any time". It may block or disable the Apple Account, stop a new account being created with the same email address or phone number, and involve law enforcement "if necessary". The article adds that not all features are available in all countries or regions.
Questions the article leaves open
Three things matter to anyone managing Apple devices at work, and Apple answers none of them. The article has no release date for 27.3. It does not define harmful content. It does not say whether links created before the update are checked once a device moves to 27.3. Managed Apple Accounts, the kind issued by an organisation, are not mentioned either, so an administrator cannot tell from this page whether an automated finding could disable a work identity.
Where to act before the update lands
Organisations that allow iCloud Drive for work can use the time before 27.3 to decide whether files containing client or personal data may leave by that route at all. Where a recipient is known, "People you choose" remains the option the article does not place under these checks. Any data protection assessment that relied on Advanced Data Protection for iCloud sharing should be reread with this exception in mind.
Related listings
iCloud is listed in our file sharing category, and our cloud storage software category holds eight products for teams comparing other link-sharing models.
Related on TrustList:
- Dropbox plans to buy object storage firm Tigris Data
- NetApp StorageGRID login bypass leaves branches 11.3 to 11.8 unfixed
Sources
Categories & features
TrustList Weekly
The week in software and IT, in one email
The news that matters to buyers, new rankings and our own research. Every Thursday, free, and easy to leave.
You may be interested in
Fixes exist only for the 11.9, 12.0 and 12.1 lines, so owners of older object stores face a migration rather than a patch. No exploitation had been reported at publication.
A network move in February 2025 exposed a validation archive, and one account read it for about five days in 2026. A small minority of customers had ID documents in it.
The Berkeley RISELab spin-out is closing its business; its open-source agent trust projects carry on at AgenTrust and its summit moves to the Linux Foundation. Customers need a migration plan.
The warning first shipped to Enhanced Protection users and is now on by default for everyone. Single-label intranet names and local IP addresses are exempt, but internal sites on public domains are not.
Three high severity flaws affect customer-managed zones on version 5; version 6 is not affected, and Italy's national cyber agency rates the systemic impact as medium.
VulnCheck reports exploitation attempts against a critical Rejetto HFS flaw that lets an attacker forge administrator sessions and run code. HFS 3.2.1 fixed it on 13 July; versions 3.0.0 to 3.2.0 are reported as affected.
Italy's CSIRT rates the batch critical for systemic impact. The worst lets an unauthenticated client write outside the root of rclone serve webdav; version 1.75.2, out since 9 October, fixes all ten.
More on TrustList
Everything here links back to the same verified catalogue. Pick your next stop.
- More United States of AmericaThe ranking for this subject
- CompaniesAgencies, consultancies and IT service providers, ranked by verified reviews.
- ProductsSoftware and SaaS with pricing, features, integrations and alternatives.
- AwardsAnnual recognition decided by verified reviews and an independent jury.
- LaunchesNew products and releases, voted up by the community every day.
- AI ModelsBenchmark scores and community ratings for every major model.
- RequestsBuyers describe what they need; vendors respond directly.
- PeopleReviewers, authors and makers with public profiles.
- ComparePut up to four listings side by side before you shortlist.