Mistral kept its end-of-October promise, but the Ecosystem Open-Weight licence makes any business offering the model as a service sign a commercial deal first. Internal use stays free; API prices are $0.70 and $2.10 per million tokens.
Asahi Linux drops MIT for GPL after code was lifted from private forks
EditorialBy TrustList Editorial
The project behind Linux on Apple Silicon says feature code was published without attribution or rewritten with LLM help, and that all of its code will now be strong copyleft only.
- Linux
- Software License Management
About Asahi Linux drops MIT for GPL after code was lifted from private forks
Asahi Linux drops MIT for GPL after code was lifted from private forks
7 November 2026: Asahi Linux, the project that brings Linux to Apple Silicon Macs, has begun moving all of its repositories from the permissive MIT licence to the GNU General Public License version 2 or later. "Going forward all Asahi Linux code will be licenced under strong copyleft licences only," James Calligeros wrote in the project's Linux 7.3 progress report.
Not yet independently verified. Asahi has not said when the transition will finish, how code already contributed under MIT will be relicensed, or which projects it has in mind. Its own report is the only primary source. We will update this when it can be confirmed, and remove this note.
What the project says happened
The report describes multiple attempts to use the permissive licensing to hijack the project's work, "with a direct view to replacing the project and aggressively monetising Linux on Apple Silicon". In the most extreme cases, it says, feature code still in development was taken from developers' personal forks and published without attribution, or rewritten with LLM assistance to hide where it came from.
"The MIT licence explicitly allows this, and has no carveouts to protect against bad faith actors," the report says. It also blames demand for high-quality training data from frontier AI labs. No company or project is named.
An old precedent from WINE
Asahi chose MIT at the start so that the BSDs and other free operating systems could reuse its work. It compares its position to WINE, the Windows compatibility layer, which was MIT-licensed until proprietary forks led its developers to relicense under the LGPL in 2002. That move was meant to stop further proprietary forks and encourage contributions back to the original project.
Asahi calls its own decision difficult. The wording is that it will "begin the process" of transition, and the report gives no finishing date.
Who has to check their dependencies
The practical effect falls on anyone building on Asahi code. A product or distribution that ships Asahi components under MIT terms should identify which repositories it draws on, and which commit it pinned, before taking later updates. Code taken under the GPL brings source-sharing obligations on distribution that MIT did not. BSD projects, which Asahi originally wanted to help, face the same question.
It's FOSS points out that the report does not say how existing contributions will be relicensed or whether every past contributor has agreed. Each repository's licence file is the record to watch, since the announcement gives no dates. Asahi offers no evidence of the LLM rewriting in the report.
Related tools
Asahi Linux itself has no listing with us.
Sources
- Asahi Linux: Progress Report, Linux 7.3, 7 November 2026
- It's FOSS: Asahi Linux drops MIT for GPL, 8 November 2026
Categories & features
- Linux
- Software License Management
TrustList Weekly
The week in software and IT, in one email
The news that matters to buyers, new rankings and our own research. Every Thursday, free, and easy to leave.
You may be interested in
The draft Public Ruling turns on the rights a licence grants, not on the contract name or where the server sits. Royalties face 10% withholding tax. Comments close on 5 November 2026.
Comments close at 5pm on 13 November and the final decision is due by 13 February 2027. Copilot, security bundling and where Microsoft licences can run are first on the roadmap.
Eight of the 13 specified models dated October ship downloadable weights, and all eight are Apache 2.0, while only five of the 45 open rows record any price.
Of 40 vendor-change items our desk published from 20 September to 5 October, 27 record both dates: median notice 48 days, range 0 to 390, and 12 gave a month or less.
Microsoft prices Windows 10 ESU at $61 per device for year one and says the price doubles each year, so the second year for commercial customers is $122. The first ESU year ends this month.
Governor Newsom signed AB 1776, the COMPETE Act, on 30 September 2026. From 1 January 2027 California law bans monopolisation and monopsonisation by a single firm; only the Attorney General and district attorneys can enforce it.
Microsoft said on 25 September 2026 that the per-user Copilot licence will carry usage limits, and that Cowork, Code, Autopilot and frontier models move to usage-based billing with Copilot Credits, off until an admin sets a spending policy.
More on TrustList
Everything here links back to the same verified catalogue. Pick your next stop.
- More LinuxThe ranking for this subject
- CompaniesAgencies, consultancies and IT service providers, ranked by verified reviews.
- ProductsSoftware and SaaS with pricing, features, integrations and alternatives.
- AwardsAnnual recognition decided by verified reviews and an independent jury.
- LaunchesNew products and releases, voted up by the community every day.
- AI ModelsBenchmark scores and community ratings for every major model.
- RequestsBuyers describe what they need; vendors respond directly.
- PeopleReviewers, authors and makers with public profiles.
- ComparePut up to four listings side by side before you shortlist.