24 Sept 2026
Microsoft ends Microsoft 365 E5, E7 and Copilot CSP promotions on 30 September
Microsoft’s reseller promotions on Microsoft 365 E5, E7 and Copilot end on 30 September, when new partner growth margins start. Buyers…
Jared Palmer's open-source family of small decision models (0.8B, 4B and 9B) on Qwen3.5 that return typed yes/no, choice and score probabilities, released 20 September 2026 under Apache 2.0 with training code and evaluation data.
Not yet independently verified. Kev is an individual developer's project, and all accuracy and calibration figures come from the author's own evaluation harness; RuntimeWire (21 September 2026) reported them without independent testing. We will update this when it can be confirmed, and remove this note.
Kev is a family of small open-weight decision models released by Jared Palmer as a personal open-source project. Kev takes a piece of text or application state and answers several typed questions about it in one request: yes/no probabilities, multiple-choice picks with a probability for each option, and ratings on an ordered scale. It copies the System One API of TypeSafe's hosted Jev service, so TypeSafe's Python SDK can be pointed at a local Kev server.
The GitHub repository was created on 17 September 2026 with a 0.5-billion-parameter prototype. The current family, built on Qwen3.5 base models at 0.8B, 4B and 9B, was published as a GitHub release on 20 September; its Hugging Face repositories were created on 19 and 20 September, and the weights were updated on 21 September. Each model is a LoRA adapter with a small pointer head on the Qwen3.5 base. Code, adapters and evaluation data are under Apache 2.0. Kev runs on CUDA, ROCm and Apple Silicon; the 4B and 9B models fit a 32 GB Mac in bf16, though the author notes they are slow there, and the server handles one request at a time.
In the author's own evaluation, Kev-9B reaches 0.852 accuracy on a test set drawn from sources it was not trained on, and trails hosted Jev by 3.5 points on the development set; the author notes this is not a controlled comparison. Probabilities are calibrated with a single temperature, and confident wrong answers still occur. Training covered at most 1,024 tokens per state and question, while serving allows 8,192. Knowledge questions remain a large gap, option order can change answers, and users are told to test on their own data before choosing thresholds.
| Benchmark | Official | Community avg |
|---|---|---|
| No benchmark scores yet. Be the first to add one. | ||
“Official” values are editor-approved and feed the ranking. “Community avg” is the mean of member submissions (shown for transparency; it never affects the ranking until an editor approves a value).
Sign in to add a benchmark score for this model.
An earned signal from verification, reviews, awards, transparency and engagement — the vendor can't buy it.
Updated 9/22/2026
No questions yet. Be the first to ask about Kev.
Everything here links back to the same verified catalogue. Pick your next stop.