28 Sept 2026
Luno acquires GTXN to run cross-border business payments between developed and emerging markets
Luno said on 22 September 2026 that it has acquired GTXN, a Nairobi-founded cross-border payments business led by Dan Kleinbaum. GTXN…
InternLM’s open decision models in 0.8B, 2B and 4B sizes: given a state, optional images and typed questions, they return a probability for each allowed answer in one pass instead of writing text. Apache 2.0.
Not yet independently verified. InternLM’s own model cards and code repository are the only first-hand sources; InternLM published no announcement, and the one outside write-up (an OrcaRouter blog post of 26 September) repeats InternLM’s figures without testing them. All benchmark and latency figures are InternLM’s own runs. The weights are Apache 2.0, but they derive from Qwen3.5 and carry Qwen’s licence alongside, which a business should review. We will update this when it can be confirmed, and remove this note.
Intern-Decision is a set of three open-weight decision models from InternLM, the open-model team behind the Intern series, placed on Hugging Face on 26 September 2026 in 0.8B, 2B and 4B sizes, with training and inference code on GitHub. They are fine-tunes of Alibaba’s Qwen3.5 models of the same sizes, with the vision encoder left frozen. A request gives a shared state (text, plus up to eight images), and a schema of named questions — pick one option, yes or no, or a score — and the model returns a probability for every allowed answer to every question in a single forward pass. It never generates free text, so it cannot answer outside the options it was given, though it can pick the wrong one. The model card’s inference engine rejects inputs over 8,192 tokens by default. This puts it in the same group as TypeSafe’s Jev and Interfaze’s Lev: models for routing, triage, moderation and agent decisions at volume, run on a business’s own hardware with no per-call charge. InternLM reports that the 4B model averages 90.02 per cent across seven test suites against 88.74 for Jev, and answers in about 44 milliseconds on one RTX 4090 against about 110 for Jev; the 0.8B model averages 79.38 per cent. Those are InternLM’s own measurements and are not stored as scores. The weights are released under Apache 2.0, with Qwen’s licence kept alongside; the GitHub repository holds the code but not the training data.
| Benchmark | Official | Community avg |
|---|---|---|
| No benchmark scores yet. Be the first to add one. | ||
“Official” values are editor-approved and feed the ranking. “Community avg” is the mean of member submissions (shown for transparency; it never affects the ranking until an editor approves a value).
Sign in to add a benchmark score for this model.
An earned signal from verification, reviews, awards, transparency and engagement — the vendor can't buy it.
Updated 9/28/2026
Used it? Your experience helps other buyers decide.
Write a reviewNo questions yet. Be the first to ask about Intern-Decision.
Everything here links back to the same verified catalogue. Pick your next stop.