REBASOFT Limited

Serving network and security teams in the UK, REBASOFT Limited builds software that pulls information from many points across an organisation's infrastructure and correlates it, so that teams can tell which assets are connected, which are exposed and which are working. The company says its platform runs without installed agents and without active scanning, and that its engineers have themselves run and secured networks.

Asset and service intelligence

The asset module discovers systems across networks, cloud, containers and software as a service, then groups them by the business services they support. Teams can therefore see which infrastructure sits beneath a service rather than a flat list of machines. Dependency mapping adds a second view, showing what each service relies on and which services a single exposed asset could bring down.

Vulnerabilities and secure configuration

Vulnerabilities are ranked by their weight to the business, and known exploited flaws are placed first, so the fixes most important to the organisation come before the findings a scanner happens to list. Secure configuration is measured continuously against Cyber Essentials, CIS and STIG benchmarks, and drift from the baseline is caught when it happens. The company says this also automates much of the evidence needed for Cyber Essentials and comparable standards.

Identity, access and Microsoft 365

The user access module shows who has access, and why, across Active Directory, Entra ID and Microsoft 365, including where privileged or stale accounts create risk. It can also report wasted licences, multi-factor coverage, privileged roles and device evidence from Intune, drawn from a read-only tenant connection.

Regulated sectors and stated outcomes

The company says its customers run between 20 and 200,000 users, spread across over 50 countries, in highly regulated fields that include banking, policing, councils, schools, factories, shops, charities and managed security providers. Its stated outcomes are less manual audit work, lower technology cost through fewer overlapping tools, and board reporting that leadership can act on.